E-Government development strategies in the Eastern Partnership countries

Main Article Content

Fesenko Galyna, Dr. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-484X Fesenko Tetiana, Dr. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-9598


The article aims to outline the role of e-democracy within the setting of the Eastern Partnership program. The article provides the comparative review of E-Government progress in six EaP countries in 2009 – 2016. The E-Government sensitive data of international ratings is analyzed with the special focus on participative aspects. The existing differences of E-Government strategies between the Eastern Partnerships countries are analyzed with the special focus on e-participate. The e-participate differences in the development of the countries are pointed out in terms of e-democracy development. The cognitive model of integrating e-democracy components into the socio-technical system of e-government is proposed.

Article DOI : 10.5958/2347-6869.2017.00007.3

Article Details

How to Cite
Galyna, F., & Tetiana, F. (2017). E-Government development strategies in the Eastern Partnership countries. S O C R A T E S, 5(1), 51-63. Retrieved from https://socratesjournal.com/index.php/SOCRATES/article/view/286
Politics, Law and Governance


Fesenko, G. (2012). Polʹshcha-Ukrayina: sotsiokulʹturnyy kontekst proektiv yevrointehratsiyi. Czlowiek ludzi w Europie: w poszukiwaniu różnorodności. Torun: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszalek : 191 - 208.
Fesenko, T. and Fesenko, G. (2016). E-Readiness evaluation modelling for the monitoring programs E-Government at the national level (for the example of Ukraine). Easten-European Journal of Interiorise Technologies. 3(81) : 28 - 35. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71606.
Fesenko, T., Shahov, A., Fesenko, G. (2017). 性别指数:一种测量新丝绸之路发展的工具 Gender Indexes as the Instrument of New Silk Road Development. 丝路发展与治理创新:“一带一路”沿线国家社会发展国际学术会议论丛 Silk Road Develop and Governance Innovation: Social Development International Symposium in “The belt and road” along countries. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China) : 100 - 105. Retrieved from http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/45534/.
Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability. Culture`s essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd.
Łapczyński, M. (2009). The European Union’s eastern partnership: chances and perspectives. Caucasian review of international affairs. 3(2) : 43 - 155.
Dr. Maarten, H. (2016). A modern Socrates discourse in a local e-government setting. SOCRATES. 4(3) : 1 - 12.
Prof. Ohara, S. (2005), P2M. A guidebook of project and program management for enterprise innovation. Project Management Association of Japan (PMAJ). Retrieved from https://articulospm.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/p2mguidebookvolume1_060112.pdf.
Sian, L. and Yih, C. (2012). A review towards the new Japanese project management: P2M and KPM. Trends and Development in Management Studies. 1(1) : 25 - 41.
Tallo, I, Hänni, L., Ott, A., Rikk R. and Peda M. (2013). Eastern Partnership Review Comparative Study of Open Governance and Data Security in Eastern Partnership Countries. Tallinn: Estonian Center of Eastern Partnership (ECEAP).
Talmachiu, M. (2015). The influence of cultural variables on sustainable development. An analysis in the European context. Regional development and integration. New challenges for the EU. EURINT conference proceedings, May 22-23, 2015. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” : 328 - 341.
United Nations E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the future we want. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/portals/egovkb/documents/un/2014-survey/e-gov_complete_survey-2014.pdf.
United Nations E-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN96407.pdf.