Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
How and Why to Analogize Socratic Questioning to Zen Buddhist Koan Practice

How and Why to Analogize Socratic Questioning to Zen Buddhist Koan Practice

Hake Stephanie E

Abstract


The nature and aim of Socrates’ philosophical method is a contested matter in ancient philosophy scholarship. Among scholars who believe that there is a coherent method in Plato’s dialogues, it is generally agreed that Socrates’ method is a practice that aims to elicit something by way of question and answer. I, among others, believe that something to be a transformation (in the sense of an awakening) on the part of the interlocutor to his own ignorance and conceit of knowledge. Instead of pointing to Plato’s dialogues for evidence in order to argue for this, I analogize the method and aim of Socratic Questioning to Zen Buddhist koan practice. 


Keywords


Socrates’ philosophical method; Socratic Questioning; Zen Buddhist koan practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benson, H.H. (2000). Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Dialogues. New York: Oxford University Press.

Beversluis, J. (2000). Cross-Examining Socrates. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brickhouse, T.C. and N.D. Smith. (2000). The Philosophy of Socrates. Colorado: Westview Press.

Forster, M. (2006). “Socrates’ Demand For Definitions”. In D. Sedley (Ed.). Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXI, 31,

Foulk, T.G. (2000). “The Form and Function of Koan Literature: A Historical Overview”. The Koan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Frede, M. (1992). “Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grube, G.M.A. (1981). Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.

Heine, S. and D.S. Wright. (2000). “Introduction: Koan Tradition—Self-Narrative and Contemporary Perspectives”. The Koan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kraut, R. (2013). "Plato". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E.N. Zalta (Ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/plato/.

Nails, D. (1999). “Mouthpiece Schmouthpiece”. Who Speaks for Plato? G.A. Press. (Ed.). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Peterson, S. (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Plato. (1987). Gorgias. D.J. Zeyl (Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

---. Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo. G.M.A. Grube (Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2002. pg, 1-20, 21-44, 58-92.

Sick, D. (2007). “When Socrates met the Buddha: Greek and Indian Dialectic in Hellenistic Bactria and India”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 17.3.

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Meno.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. Web. 22 Jun. 2014.

Tarrant, H. (2002). “Elenchos and Exetasis: Capturing the Purpose of the Socratic Interrogation”. Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. Ed. Scott, G.A. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind. Ed. Trudy Dixon. New York: John Weatherhill, Inc.

Vlastos, G. (1983). “The Socratic Elenchus”. The Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy.

Wolfsdorf, D. (2013). “Socratic Philosophizing”. The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. Bloomsbury Academic.

Zehl, D. (1987). “Introduction”. Gorgias. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Zen Buddhism: An Introduction to Zen with Stories; Parables and Koan Riddles Told by the Zen Masters. Mount Vernon, New York: Peter Pauper Press, 1959.


Refbacks





Copyright (c) 2014 Hake Stephanie E

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Recommendations:

  1. A Critical Analysis of the Arguments from Alternation and Recollection for the Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo (Issue: Issue - September)
  2. 2ND DISPLACEMENT OF THE INHABITANTS OF MANIPUR DURING THE WORLD WAR II (Issue: Issue - September)
  3. Africa’s Science and Technology Strategy in the Thought of Kwame Nkrumah (Issue: Issue-March)
  4. Deep Fun (Issue: Issue- June)
  5. Failure of the Audiovisual Media Law and the contradiction that holds public interest hostage (Issue: ISSUE - MARCH)
  6. Metaphor in Sarah Kane’s 4.48 Psychosis (Issue: Issue- September)


 

ONLINE SINCE NOVEMBER 16, 2013

Website last updated: June 23, 2017, at 02:30 PM
STATUS: LIVE AND SYNCHRONIZED
 
 

REGISTERED JOURNAL FOR INDEXING (METADATA HARVESTING)

 
INDEXING
 
The contents of this journal are indexed within a globally distributed system of research databases. SOCRATES is data provider to several research databases.

The base URL for SOCRATES Repository: OAI-PMH version is 2.0 is http://www.socratesjournal.com/index.php/socrates/oai If you are an editor/admin/manager of a research database please feel free to include/harvest our content into your database. Please find more information about the Repository here.


Copyright © Publisher

No part of this website (excluding the on-line & print Versions of the journal that are licensed under the Creative common License ) may be reproduced, published, distributed, displayed, performed, copied or stored for public or private use in any information retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any mechanical, photographic or electronic process, including electronically or digitally on the Internet or World Wide Web, or over any network, or local area network, without written permission of the publisher of the website.No part of this website may be modified or changed or exploited in any way used for derivative works, or offered for sale, or used to construct any kind of database or mirrored at any other location without the express permission of the publisher of the website.Thank you for respecting the intellectual property rights. Acknowledgement: Image of Socrates http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Socrates.png

DISCLAIMER:

Views expressed in articles/research papers /manuscripts are the personal opinion of the author/ contributor and are in no sense official, neither the journal SOCRATES nor any member of the journal is responsible. In case any Research paper/Article is found previously published anywhere else, the author/ contributor will be entirely responsible.There would be no responsibility of any member of the journal.

Focus and Scope | Section Policies | Peer Review Process | Publication Frequency | Subscriptions | Memberships | Socrates Author Self-Archiving Policy | Online Submissions | Privacy Statement | Journal Sponsorship | Advertise with us | Contact us | Author Index | Title Index | Attribution | Competing Interest | Benefits of Publishing with Socrates | GOOGLE PLAY HELP |